2025 Broadway, Inc. v. Wolf
This text of 187 Misc. 1065 (2025 Broadway, Inc. v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum
The landlord’s proofs do not show the violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancies within the meaning of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Bent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13918) so as to authorize summary proceedings for removal of the tenants; and such removal would seem inconsistent with the legislative intent manifested in section 261 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. (See, also,'Multiple Dwelling Law, § 260, ás ámd. by-L. 1946, ch. 180.)
The final orders should be reversed, with $30 costs as of one appeal, and final ordérs directed for the tenants, with costs.
McLaughlin, Eder and Heoht, JJ., concur.
Orders reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 Misc. 1065, 66 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2025-broadway-inc-v-wolf-nyappterm-1946.