2025 Broadway, Inc. v. Wolf

187 Misc. 1065, 66 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2967
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 7, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum

Per Curiam.

The landlord’s proofs do not show the violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancies within the meaning of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Bent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13918) so as to authorize summary proceedings for removal of the tenants; and such removal would seem inconsistent with the legislative intent manifested in section 261 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. (See, also,'Multiple Dwelling Law, § 260, ás ámd. by-L. 1946, ch. 180.)

The final orders should be reversed, with $30 costs as of one appeal, and final ordérs directed for the tenants, with costs.

McLaughlin, Eder and Heoht, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

2025 Broadway, Inc. v. Wolf, 187 Misc. 1065, 66 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

187 Misc. 1065 (2025 Broadway, Inc. v. Wolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levine v. Finkelstein
274 A.D. 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Guaranty Trust Co. v. Nelson
189 Misc. 915 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)