201009-112913

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedJuly 14, 2021
Docket201009-112913
StatusUnpublished

This text of 201009-112913 (201009-112913) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
201009-112913, (bva 2021).

Opinion

Citation Nr: AXXXXXXXX Decision Date: 07/14/21 Archive Date: 07/14/21

DOCKET NO. 201009-112913 DATE: July 14, 2021

ORDER

Entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to a combination of service-connected disabilities is granted from September 10, 2019 through March 26, 2020, subject to the law and regulations governing the payment of monetary benefits.

Entitlement to a TDIU solely due to service-connected major depressive disorder with unspecified anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder, is granted from March 27, 2020, subject to the law and regulations governing the payment of monetary benefits.

Entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) at the housebound rate is granted effective from March 27, 2020, subject to the laws and regulations governing the payment of monetary benefits.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The most probative evidence of record establishes that the Veteran was no longer employed full-time as of September 10, 2019.

2. The most probative evidence of record establishes that it is at least as likely as not "factually ascertainable" that, from September 10, 2019 through March 26, 2020, the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, considered in combination, were productive of functional impairment which precluded substantially gainful employment consistent with his high school education and occupational experience in customer service.

3. The most probative evidence of record establishes that it is at least as likely as not that, from March 27, 2020, and no earlier the Veteran's service-connected major depressive disorder with unspecified anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder, was productive of functional impairment which precluded substantially gainful employment consistent with his high school education and occupational experience in customer service.

4. Effective from March 27, 2020, the Veteran has a single service-connected disability of major depressive disorder with unspecified anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder which qualifies as a 100 percent rating (based on the award of TDIU herein); he also has a rating of 60 percent for atypical dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The criteria for a TDIU due to a combination of service-connected disabilities have been met for the period on appeal from September 10, 2019 through March 26, 2020. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.340, 3.341, 4.16.

2. The criteria for a TDIU solely due to service-connected major depressive disorder with unspecified anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder have been met for the period on appeal from March 27, 2020. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.340, 3.341, 4.16.

3. The criteria for SMC at the housebound rate have been met for the period on appeal from March 27, 2020. 38 U.S.C. § 1114 (s)(1); 38 C.F.R. § 3.350.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Veteran had active service from August 1989 to March 1996.

The August 2020 rating decision on appeal was issued on August 24, 2020 and constitutes an initial decision; therefore, the modernized review system, also known as the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA), applies.

In the October 2020 VA Form 10182, Decision Review Request: Board Appeal (Notice of Disagreement) (NOD), the Veteran elected the Hearing option.

In July 2021, the Veteran presented testimony at a Board hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge. During the hearing, the Veteran also waived the 90-day window for the submission of evidence following his hearing. 38 C.F.R. § 20.300(b). Further, although VA was unable to produce a written transcript of the Board hearing due to technical difficulties, there is no prejudice to the Veteran in the Board proceeding with adjudication of this appeal as the claim for a TDIU, as well as a claim for SMC, are granted to the full extent allowed under the law.

1. Entitlement a TDIU

The Veteran contends entitlement to a TDIU is warranted. Specifically, in an October 2020 NOD the Veteran argued the explanation for the increase in compensation benefits for his service-connected acquired psychiatric disorder, from 50 percent to 70 percent (as granted in the August 2020 rating decision on appeal) was inconsistent with a finding that he was able to engage in a substantially gainful occupation. The August 2020 rating decision on appeal provided favorable findings that the Veteran last worked on September 9, 2019 and that he currently met the schedular criteria for TDIU with a combined disability rating of 90 percent and with one disability rated at 70 percent.

A total disability rating may be assigned, where the schedular rating is less than total, when it is found that the disabled person is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as the result of service-connected disabilities. See 38 U.S.C. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. § 4.16. Consideration may be given to a veteran's level of education, special training, and previous work experience in arriving at a conclusion, but not to his age or the impairment caused by any nonservice-connected disabilities. See 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.16, 4.19. To meet the schedular requirements, there must be one disability ratable at 60 percent or more, or, if more than one disability, at least one disability ratable at 40 percent or more and a combined disability rating of 70 percent. 38 C.F.R. § 4.16 (a). If a veteran fails to meet the threshold minimum percentage standards enunciated in 38 C.F.R. § 4.16 (a), rating boards should refer to the Director, Compensation Service, for extraschedular consideration all cases where the veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of service-connected disability. 38 C.F.R. § 4.16 (b).

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) interpreted "unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation" under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16 (b) and also noted 38 C.F.R. § 4.16 uses the phrases "substantially gainful employment" and "substantially gainful occupation" and found these phrases were synonymous. Ray v. Wilkie, 31 Vet. App. 58, 62 (2019) (footnote 4, citing Ortiz-Valles v. McDonald, 28 Vet. App. 65, 70 (2016)). The Board notes that 38 C.F.R. § 4.16

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geib v. Shinseki
733 F.3d 1350 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Hector Ortiz-Valles v. Robert A. McDonald
28 Vet. App. 65 (Veterans Claims, 2016)
Gilbert v. Derwinski
1 Vet. App. 49 (Veterans Claims, 1990)
Bernard v. Brown
4 Vet. App. 384 (Veterans Claims, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201009-112913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/201009-112913-bva-2021.