201 Parkway Associates v. Fine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

201 Parkway Associates v. Fine

88 A.D.2d 595, 449 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 595 (201 Parkway Associates v. Fine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

201 Parkway Associates v. Fine, 88 A.D.2d 595, 449 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, for permanent injunctive relief, defendants appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Matteo, R.), dated August 25, 1981, which, inter alia, pending hearing and determination of plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoined defendants from, among other things, collecting rents or management fees from the tenants of the property at 201 Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, New York, and from managing or interfering with the management of the property. Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and decretal paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are deleted. The referee to whom plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction had been assigned greatly expanded upon the restraints included in the order to show cause dated August 5, 1981, so that the relief ultimately sought by plaintiff — the removal of defendants as managers of its apartment building — was effected. This was an abuse of discretion as no evidence had been presented to the referee tending to show that plaintiff was not adequately protected by the restraints in the order to show cause, and that the additional relief was necessary to prevent irreparable injury to it. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, for permanent injunctive relief, defendants appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Matteo, R.), dated August 25, 1981, which, inter alia, pending hearing and determination of plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoined defendants from, among other things, collecting rents or management fees from the tenants of the property at 201 Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, New York, and from managing or interfering with the management of the property. Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and decretal paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are deleted. The referee to whom plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction had been assigned greatly expanded upon the restraints included in the order to show cause dated August 5, 1981, so that the relief ultimately sought by plaintiff — the removal of defendants as managers of its apartment building — was effected. This was an abuse of discretion as no evidence had been presented to the referee tending to show that plaintiff was not adequately protected by the restraints in the order to show cause, and that the additional relief was necessary to prevent irreparable injury to it. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 595, 449 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/201-parkway-associates-v-fine-nyappdiv-1982.