2008 Lexus, TX Lic No KTD3353, VIN No 2T2HK31U48C095370 and One Thousand Eight Dollars ($1,008.00) United States Currency v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 16, 2023
Docket11-22-00138-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 2008 Lexus, TX Lic No KTD3353, VIN No 2T2HK31U48C095370 and One Thousand Eight Dollars ($1,008.00) United States Currency v. the State of Texas (2008 Lexus, TX Lic No KTD3353, VIN No 2T2HK31U48C095370 and One Thousand Eight Dollars ($1,008.00) United States Currency v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2008 Lexus, TX Lic No KTD3353, VIN No 2T2HK31U48C095370 and One Thousand Eight Dollars ($1,008.00) United States Currency v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion filed March 16, 2023

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-22-00138-CV __________

2008 LEXUS, TX LIC NO KTD3353, VIN NO 2T2HK31U48C095370 AND ONE THOUSAND EIGHT DOLLARS ($1,008.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 244th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C-21-11-1248-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION Princewill Azuburike Tata, pro se, filed this restricted appeal from a default judgment of forfeiture. However, Tata has failed to file a brief in this appeal. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed in this court on or before September 14, 2022. After granting two motions for extension and extending the due date for Appellant’s brief to December 30, 2022, this court notified Tata on January 6, 2023, that Appellant’s brief was past due. On our own motion, we extended the deadline to February 14, 2023, and informed Tata that the failure to timely mail or file Appellant’s brief by February 14 “will be grounds for dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). As of this date, Tata has not filed a brief, nor has Tata requested another extension of time in which to file the brief. Based upon Tata’s failure to prosecute this appeal in a timely manner, we conclude that this appeal should be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM March 16, 2023 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2008 Lexus, TX Lic No KTD3353, VIN No 2T2HK31U48C095370 and One Thousand Eight Dollars ($1,008.00) United States Currency v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2008-lexus-tx-lic-no-ktd3353-vin-no-2t2hk31u48c095370-and-one-thousand-texapp-2023.