2002 Irrevocable Trust for Hvizdak v. Huntington National Bank

Eleventh Circuit

2002 Irrevocable Trust for Hvizdak v. Huntington National Bank

428 F. App'x 924

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 3, 2011·No. No. 10-14045·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s order, dated March 26, 2010, and thus affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant-Appellee Shenzhen Development Bank Co. Ltd. on the Plaintiffs’ claims in Counts I, III, IV, and V of the Second Amended Complaint. In addition, we agree with the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned March 26, 2010 order of the district court judge.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s order, dated March 26, 2010, and thus affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant-Appellee Shenzhen Development Bank Co. Ltd. on the Plaintiffs’ claims in Counts I, III, IV, and V of the Second Amended Complaint. In addition, we agree with the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned March 26, 2010 order of the district court judge.

AFFIRMED.

2002 Irrevocable Trust for Hvizdak v. Huntington National Bank, 428 F. App'x 924 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

428 F. App'x 924 (2002 Irrevocable Trust for Hvizdak v. Huntington National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related