2001 Commerce Street Corp. v. Star Enterprise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

2001 Commerce Street Corp. v. Star Enterprise

306 A.D.2d 463, 761 N.Y.S.2d 493

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 463 (2001 Commerce Street Corp. v. Star Enterprise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

2001 Commerce Street Corp. v. Star Enterprise, 306 A.D.2d 463, 761 N.Y.S.2d 493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to re[464]*464cover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered March 28, 2002, as denied those branches of its motion which were for leave to amend its complaint to include causes of action to recover damages for fraud and violation of the Town of Yorktown Code, and for punitive damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for leave to amend the complaint to include a cause of action to recover damages for fraud, as it was time-barred (see CPLR 203 [fl, [g]; 213 [8]; Prestandrea v Stein, 262 AD2d 621 [1999]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to re[464]*464cover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered March 28, 2002, as denied those branches of its motion which were for leave to amend its complaint to include causes of action to recover damages for fraud and violation of the Town of Yorktown Code, and for punitive damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for leave to amend the complaint to include a cause of action to recover damages for fraud, as it was time-barred (see CPLR 203 [fl, [g]; 213 [8]; Prestandrea v Stein, 262 AD2d 621 [1999]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 463, 761 N.Y.S.2d 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2001-commerce-street-corp-v-star-enterprise-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack