200 East 74 Corp. v. Dallas

167 Misc. 2d 59, 638 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 677
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 29, 1995·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order dated March 1, 1995 dismissed, without costs, as academic.

[60] At oral argument of this appeal, we were informed that the parties had settled a subsequent nonpayment summary proceeding involving the rent arrears sought in the petition in the within nonpayment proceeding. Thus, there is now no actual dispute in controversy. Nor is there any basis for this court to exercise its discretion to retain the appeal despite the mootness since there is no showing that the single issue raised is the type likely to evade review (see, Matter of Roadway Express v Commissioner of N. Y. State Dept, of Labor, 66 NY2d 742, 744).

Parness, J. P., Miller and McCooe, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

200 East 74 Corp. v. Dallas, 167 Misc. 2d 59, 638 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

167 Misc. 2d 59 (200 East 74 Corp. v. Dallas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related