200-220 W. 26 LLC v. Carney

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 17, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 52019(U)
StatusPublished

This text of 200-220 W. 26 LLC v. Carney (200-220 W. 26 LLC v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
200-220 W. 26 LLC v. Carney, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



200-220 West 26 LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,

against

Ashley D. Carney, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.


Tenant appeals from (1) a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jean T. Schneider, J.), entered November 9, 2018, after a nonjury trial, which awarded landlord possession and a recovery of rent arrears in the principal sum of $10,642.70 in a nonpayment summary proceeding and (2) that portion of an order (same court and Judge), dated January 4, 2019, which conditionally stayed execution of the warrant of eviction only through January 18, 2019.

Per Curiam.

Final judgment (Jean T. Schneider, J.), entered November 9, 2018, modified by reducing landlord's recovery of rent arrears to the principal sum of $9,478.17; as modified, final judgment affirmed, without costs. Order (same court and Judge), dated January 4, 2019, affirmed, without costs.

Except as indicated, the trial court's resolution of the rent, habitability and other issues litigated below is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Claridge Gardens v Menotti, 160 AD2d 544 [1990]). On this record, there is no basis to disturb the court's credibility determinations, including its characterization of tenant's testimony as "deeply disturbing" and its rejection of her claims regarding, inter alia, toxic chemicals coming out of her apartment's heating unit and bathroom vent, and neighbors conspiring with landlord to stalk and attack her, as "uncorroborated and ... entirely incredible."

However, tenant established that landlord's rent ledger did not record or credit tenant's payment of monthly rent for November 2017 of $1,164.53 prior to service of landlord's rent demand in December 2017. Accordingly, we modify the final judgment accordingly.

We have considered tenant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur
Decision Date: December 17, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claridge Gardens, Inc. v. Menotti
160 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200-220 W. 26 LLC v. Carney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/200-220-w-26-llc-v-carney-nyappterm-2019.