20 Clarke Place Realty Corp. v. Rudges & Co.

267 A.D.2d 141, 700 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13260
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered December 16,1998, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss was properly denied on the ground that plaintiff commenced this action sounding in breach of contract within the applicable six-year statutory period. Defendant insurance brokers and agents are not professionals and, accordingly, the three-year Statute of Limitations for malpractice (CPLR 214 [6]) is not applicable as a bar to plaintiff’s action (see, Santiago v 1370 Broadway Assocs., 264 AD2d 624). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

20 Clarke Place Realty Corp. v. Rudges & Co., 267 A.D.2d 141, 700 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 141 (20 Clarke Place Realty Corp. v. Rudges & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weiss v. La Suisse, Societe D'assurances Sur La Vie
226 F.R.D. 446 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Trombley v. Poissant & Nichols, P. C.
279 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. NIA Group, Inc.
268 A.D.2d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)