1st Childcare & Preschool, LLC v. Tyrone Tate

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 2019
DocketA19A2243
StatusPublished

This text of 1st Childcare & Preschool, LLC v. Tyrone Tate (1st Childcare & Preschool, LLC v. Tyrone Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
1st Childcare & Preschool, LLC v. Tyrone Tate, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 29, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2243. 1ST CHILDCARE & PRESCHOOL, LLC v. TYRONE TATE.

This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court filed by Tyrone Tate against 1st Child Care and Preschool LLC dba Child First 24 Hour Day Care (“1st Child”) and “all other occupants.” Following an adverse ruling, Bonnie Stinsen, who may be residing at the property at issue, appealed the magistrate court’s decision to the superior court on behalf of herself and 1st Child. The superior court entered a writ of possession in favor of Tate. Stinsen filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the parties were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. We further note that Stinsen, who is not a licensed attorney, filed the notice of appeal on behalf of herself and 1st Child. “In this state, only a licensed attorney is authorized to represent a corporation in a proceeding in a court of record.” Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, 267 Ga. 801, 805 (2) (485 SE2d 22) (1997). A non-lawyer is not legally permitted to file pleadings on behalf of a corporation. See Congress Re-Insurance Corp. v. Archer-Western Contractors, Ltd., 226 Ga. App. 829, 831 (1) (487 SE2d 679) (1997). Thus, Stinsen is not legally permitted to file an appeal on behalf of 1st Child. See OCGA § 5-6-33.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/29/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.
485 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)
Congress Re-Insurance Corp. v. Archer-Western Contractors, Ltd.
487 S.E.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
English v. Delbridge
454 S.E.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1st Childcare & Preschool, LLC v. Tyrone Tate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1st-childcare-preschool-llc-v-tyrone-tate-gactapp-2019.