1996 Jaguar, Vin Sajhx17tc766857 v. State
This text of 1996 Jaguar, Vin Sajhx17tc766857 v. State (1996 Jaguar, Vin Sajhx17tc766857 v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-03-146-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_________________________________________________________
1996 JAGUAR, VIN# SAJHX174TC766857, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 130th District Court
of Matagorda County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Brandon Burnett, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, in cause number 02-E-0625-C. The clerk’s record was filed on April 1, 2003. The reporter’s record was filed on May 9, 2003. Appellant’s brief was due on June 9, 2003. To date, no appellate brief has been received.
When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
On June 9, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to file an appellate brief or to respond to this Court’s notice, and appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 30th day of December, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1996 Jaguar, Vin Sajhx17tc766857 v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1996-jaguar-vin-sajhx17tc766857-v-state-texapp-2004.