1911 Richmond Avenue Associates, LLC v. G.L.G. Capitol, LLC

90 A.D.3d 627, 933 N.Y.2d 899
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 627 (1911 Richmond Avenue Associates, LLC v. G.L.G. Capitol, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
1911 Richmond Avenue Associates, LLC v. G.L.G. Capitol, LLC, 90 A.D.3d 627, 933 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for breach of two leases for the rental of commercial office space. The defendants demonstrated the prima facie entitlement of the defendant J.E Turner & Co., LLC (hereinafter Turner), to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it by proffering evidence that Turner was not a party to the leases at issue in this case and thus owed no contractual duty to the plaintiff (see Black Car & Livery Ins., Inc. v H&W Brokerage, Inc., 28 AD3d 595, 596 [2006]; Lipton v Unumprovident Corp., 10 AD3d 703, 706 [2004]; Blank v Noumair, 239 AD2d 534 [1997]). In response, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the signatory tenant entered into the lease as an agent of Turner (see Hampton Living v Carltun on the Park, 286 AD2d 664, 665 [2001]; c.f. G.K. Alan Assoc. Inc. v Lazzari, 66 AD3d 830, 833 [2009]), or whether the plaintiff signed the lease in reliance on the signatory tenant’s apparent authority to act on behalf of Turner (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 231 [1984]; ER Holdings, LLC v 122 W.P.R. Corp., 65 AD3d 1275, 1277 [2009]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against Turner.

In light of this determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs remaining contention. Dillon, J.E, Eng, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 31075(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halitskov v. National Land Tenure Co. LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 32479(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Umoh v. Zunz
2025 NY Slip Op 02808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Global World Realty, Inc. v. Zubli
219 A.D.3d 1495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Arroyo v. Central Islip UFSD
2019 NY Slip Op 4669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Arroyo v. Central Islip UFSD
2019 NY Slip Op 4688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Victory State Bank v. EMBA Hylan, LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 1253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Environmental Appraisers & Builders, LLC v. Imhof
2016 NY Slip Op 6677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 627, 933 N.Y.2d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1911-richmond-avenue-associates-llc-v-glg-capitol-llc-nyappdiv-2011.