190517-5707

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedSeptember 26, 2019
Docket190517-5707
StatusUnpublished

This text of 190517-5707 (190517-5707) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
190517-5707, (bva 2019).

Opinion

Citation Nr: AXXXXXXXX Decision Date: 09/26/19 Archive Date: 09/26/19

DOCKET NO. 190517-5707 DATE: September 26, 2019

ORDER

Entitlement to an initial rating of 70 percent, but no higher, for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder, from November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018, is granted, subject to the regulations governing the payment of monetary awards.

Entitlement to a total disability rating based on unemployability (TDIU) due to the acquired psychiatric disability is granted from November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018, subject to the regulations governing the payment of monetary awards.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. From November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018, the severity, frequency and duration of the Veteran’s acquired psychiatric disability symptoms most closely approximated occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas.

2. From November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018, the Veteran is unable to obtain or maintain substantially gainful employment solely due to his service-connected disability.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. From November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018, the criteria for a disability rating of 70 percent, but no higher, for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include PTSD and major depressive disorder, were met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.126, 4.130, Diagnostic Code 9434.

2. From November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018, the criteria for entitlement to TDIU were met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.340, 3.341, 4.16.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Veteran served on active duty from September 1960 to June 1965.

This matter is before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) on appeal from a February 2019 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) which granted service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder with psychiatric features, with an initial rating of 30 percent effective November 18, 2014, and of 100 percent from September 8, 2018. The Veteran was notified of the decision in May 2019.

The Veteran selected the Evidence Submission review lane in his May 2019 notice of disagreement. Therefore, evidence submitted within 90 days of the notice of disagreement, including a May 2019 private opinion, has been considered.

As discussed below, the Board finds that the issue of entitlement to a TDIU from November 18, 2014 to September 8, 2018, has been raised by the record, specifically in the May 2019 private opinion submitted within 90 days of the notice of disagreement. See Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet. App. 447 (2009).

Entitlement to a higher initial rating for an acquired psychiatric disability, rated as 30 percent disabling from November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018.

The Veteran asserts that he is entitled to a rating in excess of 30 percent for the service-connected acquired psychiatric disability from November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018.

The Veteran’s acquired psychiatric disability, to include PTSD and major depressive disorder is rated under Diagnostic Code 9434. 38 C.F.R. § 4.130.

Under the General Formula for Mental Disorders (General Formula), the Board must conduct a “holistic analysis” that considers all associated symptoms, regardless of whether they are listed as criteria. Bankhead v. Shulkin, 29 Vet. App. 10, 22 (2017); 38 C.F.R. § 4.130. The Board must determine whether unlisted symptoms are similar in severity, frequency, and duration to the listed symptoms associated with specific disability percentages. Then, the Board must determine whether the associated symptoms, both listed and unlisted, caused the level of impairment required for a higher disability rating. Vazquez-Claudio v. Shinseki, 713 F.3d 112, 114-118 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

The issue in this appeal is whether the Veteran’s associated symptoms caused the level of impairment required for a disability rating in excess of 30 percent from November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018. The Veteran’s psychiatric disability is rated as 100 percent disabling, the highest available level, from September 8, 2018.

The Board concludes that the Veteran’s overall symptoms most closely approximated a level of impairment of 70 percent disabling from November 18, 2014, to September 8, 2018.

A 30 percent rating is assigned when symptoms such as depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, or mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, or recent events), cause occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and normal conversation).

A 50 percent rating is assigned when symptoms such as flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; or difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships cause occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity.

A 70 percent rating is assigned when symptoms such as suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant speech; near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a worklike setting); or inability to establish and maintain effective relationships cause occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood.

A 100 percent rating is assigned when symptoms such as gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; or memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation or own name cause total occupational and social impairment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sterling T. Rice v. Eric K. Shinseki
22 Vet. App. 447 (Veterans Claims, 2009)
Genaro Vazquez-Claudio v. Shinseki
713 F.3d 112 (Federal Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190517-5707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/190517-5707-bva-2019.