17 East Owners Corp. v. Madison 96th Associates, LLC

2016 NY Slip Op 8966, 145 A.D.3d 646, 42 N.Y.S.3d 805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2016·No. 2589N 601386/03 108695/04·Published

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered June 11, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the in limine motion of defendant Madison 96th Associates, LLC to preclude the testimony of Frank Luzi, P.E., unanimously dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from an evidentiary ruling made before trial, either by right or by permission (see Matter of Grusetz, 248 AD2d 618 [1st Dept 1998]). Such a ruling is reviewable only in connection with an appeal from the judgment rendered after trial (see Weatherbee Constr. Corp. v Miele, 270 AD2d 182 [1st Dept 2000]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

17 East Owners Corp. v. Madison 96th Associates, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 8966, 145 A.D.3d 646, 42 N.Y.S.3d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8966 (17 East Owners Corp. v. Madison 96th Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weatherbee Construction Corp. v. Miele
270 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)