16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. Sanders

254 S.W.3d 927, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 929, 2008 WL 2414984

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 2008·No. WD 68811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of Missouri appeals an award from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations awarding Claimant John Sanders unemployment benefits. It argues that the Board incorrectly determined that Claimant’s actions did not constitute sufficient misconduct under § 288.050.2 to disqualify him from receiving benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of Missouri appeals an award from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations awarding Claimant John Sanders unemployment benefits. It argues that the Board incorrectly determined that Claimant’s actions did not constitute sufficient misconduct under § 288.050.2 to disqualify him from receiving benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. Sanders, 254 S.W.3d 927, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 929, 2008 WL 2414984 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

254 S.W.3d 927 (16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related