164 Ludlow Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

164 Ludlow Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

275 A.D.2d 666, 713 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 666 (164 Ludlow Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

164 Ludlow Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 275 A.D.2d 666, 713 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority dated November 17, 1999, revoking petitioner’s on-premises liquor license and imposing a civil penalty of $4,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court [667]*667by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [James Yates, J.], entered December 17, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the findings of various violations of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law by petitioner, including selling alcohol to minors and making material false representations in its application for a liquor license. The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority dated November 17, 1999, revoking petitioner’s on-premises liquor license and imposing a civil penalty of $4,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court [667]*667by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [James Yates, J.], entered December 17, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the findings of various violations of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law by petitioner, including selling alcohol to minors and making material false representations in its application for a liquor license. The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 666, 713 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/164-ludlow-corp-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-2000.