1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky

975 So. 2d 1233, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2008 WL 649040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 2008·No. No. 3D07-1633·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiffs fifth amended complaint, with prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse.

“A legal malpractice action has three elements: 1) the attorney’s employment; 2) the attorney’s neglect of a reasonable duty; and 3) the attorney’s negligence as the proximate cause of loss to the client.” Law Ofc. of David J. Stern, P.A. v. Sec. Nat’l Servicing Corp., 969 So.2d 962, 966 (Fla.2007). The complaint and attached exhibits properly alleged these elements. As such, the dismissal was in error. Accordingly, we remand with instructions that plaintiffs cause be reinstated.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky, 975 So. 2d 1233, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2008 WL 649040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

975 So. 2d 1233 (1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spoor v. State
975 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)