16-42 170

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedAugust 15, 2018
Docket16-42 170
StatusUnpublished

This text of 16-42 170 (16-42 170) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
16-42 170, (bva 2018).

Opinion

Citation Nr: 1829801 Decision Date: 08/15/18 Archive Date: 08/30/18

DOCKET NO. 16-42 170 ) DATE ) )

On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Waco, Texas

THE ISSUE

Entitlement to an initial compensable rating for a bilateral hearing loss disability prior to May 16, 2017, and in excess of 10 percent thereafter.

REPRESENTATION

Appellant represented by: Texas Veterans Commission

ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

M. Thomas, Associate Counsel

INTRODUCTION

The Veteran, who is the appellant in this case, served on active duty from June 1969 to April 1971.

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an August 2013 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Waco, Texas.

In August 2017, during the pendency of the present appeal, the RO increased the rating for a bilateral hearing loss disability from 0 percent to 10 percent, effective May 16, 2017. Nonetheless, because less than the maximum available benefit for a schedular rating was awarded and because the increases were not awarded for the entirety of the claims period, the claims remain before the Board. See Fenderson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 119, 126 (1999); AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993).

The Veteran requested a Board hearing in his August 2016 VA Form 9. However, in August 2018, the Veteran withdrew his request for a hearing.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Veteran in this case served on active duty from June 1969 to April 1971.

2. On August 6, 2018, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of the Veteran's appeal for an increased initial rating for a bilateral hearing loss disability have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105 (2012). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204.

In the present case, the appellant has withdrawn this appeal regarding an increased initial rating for a bilateral hearing loss disability and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed.

ORDER

The appeal seeking an increased initial rating for a bilateral hearing loss disability is dismissed.

S. B. MAYS Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals

Department of Veterans Affairs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AB v. Brown
6 Vet. App. 35 (Veterans Claims, 1993)
Fenderson v. West
12 Vet. App. 119 (Veterans Claims, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16-42 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/16-42-170-bva-2018.