155 West 21st Street, LLC v. McMullan

New York Court of Appeals

155 West 21st Street, LLC v. McMullan

26 N.E.3d 777, 24 N.Y.3d 1111, 2 N.Y.S.3d 838

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2015·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and respondent’s cross motion for sanctions, costs, and attorneys’ fees denied. Under these circumstances, the Appellate Division abused its discretion in imposing sanctions for frivolous conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and respondent’s cross motion for sanctions, costs, and attorneys’ fees denied. Under these circumstances, the Appellate Division abused its discretion in imposing sanctions for frivolous conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

155 West 21st Street, LLC v. McMullan, 26 N.E.3d 777, 24 N.Y.3d 1111, 2 N.Y.S.3d 838 (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

26 N.E.3d 777 (155 West 21st Street, LLC v. McMullan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related