155 West 21st Street, LLC v. Alistair McMullan

New York Court of Appeals

155 West 21st Street, LLC v. Alistair McMullan

DecidedJanuary 8, 2015

Docket69 SSM 29

StatusPublished

This text of 155 West 21st Street, LLC v. Alistair McMullan (155 West 21st Street, LLC v. Alistair McMullan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

155 West 21st Street, LLC v. Alistair McMullan, (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 69 SSM 29 In the Matter of 155 West 21st Street, LLC, Appellant, et al., Petitioner, v. Alistair McMullan, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted by Nathaniel Z. Marmur, for appellant. Submitted by Gregory Sheindlin, for respondent McMullan.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and respondent's cross motion for sanctions, costs, and attorneys' fees denied. Under these circumstances, the Appellate Division abused its discretion in imposing sanctions for frivolous conduct. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided January 8, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 69 SSM 29 In the Matter of 155 West 21st Street, LLC, Appellant, et al., Petitioner, v. Alistair McMullan, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted by Nathaniel Z. Marmur, for appellant. Submitted by Gregory Sheindlin, for respondent McMullan.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and respondent's cross motion for sanctions, costs, and attorneys' fees denied. Under these circumstances, the Appellate Division abused its discretion in imposing sanctions for frivolous conduct. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided January 8, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 West 21st Street, LLC v. Alistair McMullan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/155-west-21st-street-llc-v-alistair-mcmullan-ny-2015.