15-16 272
This text of 15-16 272 (15-16 272) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Citation Nr: 1829613 Decision Date: 06/28/18 Archive Date: 07/02/18
DOCKET NO. 15-16 272 ) DATE ) )
THE ISSUE
Entitlement to revision of a February 20, 2015 Board decision on the basis of clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD
Tracie N. Wesner, Counsel
FINDING OF FACT
In March 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (hereinafter, "the Court") vacated the February 20, 2015 Board decision at issue.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
In the absence of a final decision, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the motion for revision of a decision based on CUE. 38 U.S.C. § 7111; 38 C.F.R. § 20.1400. REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION
The Veteran served on active duty in the United States Army from November 1979 to August 1980. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on a February 2015 motion for revision of a February 20, 2015 Board decision.
All final Board decisions are subject to revision on the basis of CUE except for those decisions which have been appealed to and decided by the Court, and decisions on issues which have subsequently been decided by the Court. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1400.
In a March 2016 memorandum decision, the Court vacated the February 20, 2015 Board decision that is being challenged by the Veteran on the basis of CUE. Thus, there is no final decision for the Board to review on the basis of CUE. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the motion and it is dismissed.
ORDER
The motion is dismissed.
____________________________________________ STEVEN D. REISS Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Department of Veterans Affairs
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15-16 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/15-16-272-bva-2018.