1481 Broadway Corp. v. Maiden Lane Ballroom, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

1481 Broadway Corp. v. Maiden Lane Ballroom, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 870 (1481 Broadway Corp. v. Maiden Lane Ballroom, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

1481 Broadway Corp. v. Maiden Lane Ballroom, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Apart from other considerations, our conclusion to affirm is strengthened by the fact that in 1949 (L. 1949, eh. 535) the Legislature amended subdivision (b) of section 2 of the Business Rent Law so as to include in the definition of “place of public assembly ” the words “ meeting room ”, thereby indicating that it desired to retain the strict limitations of what constituted places of public assembly. It foEows, therefore, that unless the space occupied by a tenant falls within the precise definitions of what is a place of pubHc assembly the emergency rent law is applicable. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, CaEahan, Yan Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 983.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Apart from other considerations, our conclusion to affirm is strengthened by the fact that in 1949 (L. 1949, eh. 535) the Legislature amended subdivision (b) of section 2 of the Business Rent Law so as to include in the definition of “place of public assembly ” the words “ meeting room ”, thereby indicating that it desired to retain the strict limitations of what constituted places of public assembly. It foEows, therefore, that unless the space occupied by a tenant falls within the precise definitions of what is a place of pubHc assembly the emergency rent law is applicable. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, CaEahan, Yan Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 983.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1481-broadway-corp-v-maiden-lane-ballroom-inc-nyappdiv-1950.