1466 Realty Co. v. Baum

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

1466 Realty Co. v. Baum

38 Misc. 2d 209, 239 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2403

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Misc. 2d 209 (1466 Realty Co. v. Baum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

1466 Realty Co. v. Baum, 38 Misc. 2d 209, 239 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The maximum rent, as fixed by the Rent Commission, is binding upon the Municipal Court (United County Realty Corp. v. Kranert, 35 Misc 2d 438). Insofar as Mr. Justice Wahl purported to act as arbitrator rather than as Trial Justice, albeit pursuant to stipulation, the award or disposition made in contravention of the determination of the Rent Administrator is without legal effect. Moreover, the court could not act as arbitrator of issues in an action or proceeding regularly pending before it. (See Matter of Macfadden v. Benvenga, 290 N. Y. 568; Matter of Jacobs v. Steinbrink, 242 App. Div. 197.) The proceedings are remanded for determination of the amounts due from the respective tenants and entry of appropriate final orders thereon.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovahna and Browh, JJ.

Final orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The maximum rent, as fixed by the Rent Commission, is binding upon the Municipal Court (United County Realty Corp. v. Kranert, 35 Misc 2d 438). Insofar as Mr. Justice Wahl purported to act as arbitrator rather than as Trial Justice, albeit pursuant to stipulation, the award or disposition made in contravention of the determination of the Rent Administrator is without legal effect. Moreover, the court could not act as arbitrator of issues in an action or proceeding regularly pending before it. (See Matter of Macfadden v. Benvenga, 290 N. Y. 568; Matter of Jacobs v. Steinbrink, 242 App. Div. 197.) The proceedings are remanded for determination of the amounts due from the respective tenants and entry of appropriate final orders thereon.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovahna and Browh, JJ.

Final orders reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Misc. 2d 209, 239 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1466-realty-co-v-baum-nyappterm-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack