1466 Realty Co. v. Baum

38 Misc. 2d 209, 239 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2403
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 26, 1962·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The maximum rent, as fixed by the Rent Commission, is binding upon the Municipal Court (United County Realty Corp. v. Kranert, 35 Misc 2d 438). Insofar as Mr. Justice Wahl purported to act as arbitrator rather than as Trial Justice, albeit pursuant to stipulation, the award or disposition made in contravention of the determination of the Rent Administrator is without legal effect. Moreover, the court could not act as arbitrator of issues in an action or proceeding regularly pending before it. (See Matter of Macfadden v. Benvenga, 290 N. Y. 568; Matter of Jacobs v. Steinbrink, 242 App. Div. 197.) The proceedings are remanded for determination of the amounts due from the respective tenants and entry of appropriate final orders thereon.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovahna and Browh, JJ.

Final orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1466 Realty Co. v. Baum, 38 Misc. 2d 209, 239 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

38 Misc. 2d 209 (1466 Realty Co. v. Baum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of MacFadden v. Benvenga
48 N.E.2d 166 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
United County Realty Corp. v. Kranert
35 Misc. 2d 438 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Jacobs v. Steinbrink
242 A.D. 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)