1380 Madison Avenue, L.L.C. v. 17 East Owners Corp.

12 A.D.3d 156, 783 N.Y.S.2d 473, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13064
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered October 15, 2003, which granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on its claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to establish adverse possession and/or prescriptive easement by reason of its air conditioning units protruding into plaintiff’s air space because it was unable to demonstrate that such possession was actual, hostile or under claim of right (see Joseph v Whitcombe, 279 AD2d 122 [2001]; see also Landgray Assoc. v 450 Lexington Venture, L.P., 788 F Supp 776 [SD NY 1992]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1380 Madison Avenue, L.L.C. v. 17 East Owners Corp., 12 A.D.3d 156, 783 N.Y.S.2d 473, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 156 (1380 Madison Avenue, L.L.C. v. 17 East Owners Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of N47 Assoc. LLC v. Jemsco Realty LLC
2023 NY Slip Op 03842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)