136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC v. Razinski

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT BAKER, LESHKO, SALINE & DRAPEAU, LLP ELECTRONICALLY FILED Attorneys for Plaintiff DOC #: One North Lexington Avenue DATE FILED:__1/29/2024 □ White Plains, New York 10601-1712 914.681.9500

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MEMO END ORSED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

136 FIELD POINT CIRCLE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, 21 Civ. 11076 (THR) Plaintiff, -against- NOTICE OF MOTION ALEXANDER RAZINSKI, TANYA RAZINSKI, and INVAR INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants.

COUNSELORS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affidavit of Mitchell J. Baker, sworn to January 23, 2024, plaintiff 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, Inc. will move this Court, at the Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007, Courtroom 128, at a date and time designated by this Court, for an Order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(b) granting 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC a default judgment in its favor against defendant Invar International Holding Company, Inc. for its failure to prosecute this action, (2) directing that a hearing be held for a determination of damages, and (3) together with such other, further and different relief this Court deems just. Dated: White Plains, New York January 23, 2024

BAKER, LESHKO, SALINE & DRAPEAU, LLP Attorneys for Plaintif

by:_ YM) Mitéhell J. Baker (MB-4339)

Alexander Razinski Post Office Box 8184 White Plains, New York 10602 (Via ECF and Federal Express) Tanya Razinski Post Office Box 8184 White Plains, New York 10602 (Via ECF and Federal Express)

DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Plaintiff failed to obtain the “Clerk’s Certificate of . required before seeking a default judgment.” S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing R. & Instr. 16.1; see Local Civ. R. 55.1 (“A party applying for entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) shall file .. . a request a Clerk’s Certificate of Default... .”). “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55”—not Rule 41, on which Plaintiff relies, see ECF No. 59 the entry of default and default judgment.” Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. Canal Venture, Inc., No. 15 Civ. (TPG), 2017 WL 4217152, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 21, 2017). When Plaintiff renews its motion, it shall do o in accordance with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 55.1 of the Local Rules of the States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Rule 16.1 of the Southern of New York Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, and Rule 5.H of the Court’s Individual Rules Practices in Civil Cases. Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. 59-60. SO ORDERED. . Fearden ifer H. Rearden, U.S.D.J. January 29, 2024