134 William Street Co. v. Lynch
293 U.S. 526, 55 S. Ct. 145
This text of 293 U.S. 526 (134 William Street Co. v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
134 William Street Co. v. Lynch, 293 U.S. 526, 55 S. Ct. 145 (1934).
Opinion
The motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 590; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302; Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart, 291 U. S. 643.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird
248 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1919)
New York Ex Rel. Doyle v. Atwell
261 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court, 1923)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart
291 U.S. 643 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
293 U.S. 526, 55 S. Ct. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/134-william-street-co-v-lynch-scotus-1934.