134 William Street Co. v. Lynch
293 U.S. 526, 55 S. Ct. 145
Opinion
The motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 590; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302; Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart, 291 U. S. 643.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
134 William Street Co. v. Lynch, 293 U.S. 526, 55 S. Ct. 145 (1934).
293 U.S. 526 (134 William Street Co. v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird
248 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1919)
New York Ex Rel. Doyle v. Atwell
261 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court, 1923)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart
291 U.S. 643 (Supreme Court, 1934)