1316, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

457 A.2d 181, 72 Pa. Commw. 566, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1425
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 14, 1983
DocketAppeal, No. 848 C.D. 1980
StatusPublished

This text of 457 A.2d 181 (1316, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
1316, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 457 A.2d 181, 72 Pa. Commw. 566, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1425 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

1316, Inc., appeals a Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court order which affirmed the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board’s suspension of its liquor license. We affirm.

The Board found that 1316, Inc. had violated Section 491 of the Liquor Code1 by refilling liquor bottles, and ordered a twenty-one day suspension of its restaurant liquor license. 1316, Inc., appealed to the common pleas court which, following a de novo hearing, made essentially the same findings of fact as the Board, but remanded the matter to the Board “for reconsideration of the penalty only in light of the testimony adduced before the Court of Common Pleas.2 Following reconsideration, the Board reim.posed the original twenty-one day suspension, which the common pleas court subsequently affirmed without receiving further evidence.

Where the court below has taken no additional evidence and has affirmed a liquor license suspension, our scope of review is ‘limited to determining whether the Board’s order was supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below abused its discretion or [568]*568committed an error of law. Matter of Banks, 53 Pa. Commonwealth. Ct. 11, 416 A.2d 631 (1980).

1316, Inc. ’s sole contention before this Court is that the Board erred, as a matter of law, in reimposing the suspension without holding another hearing.3 This question is not, however, within our scope of review. Matter of Banks. Thus, 1316, Inc. has not presented a question for our review.

Affirmed.

Order

The order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, dated April 8, 1980, at No. 2385 February Term, 1980, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Searer
413 A.2d 1157 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
In re T. L. J.
413 A.2d 154 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1980)
In re Suspension of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-17844
416 A.2d 631 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
457 A.2d 181, 72 Pa. Commw. 566, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1316-inc-v-commonwealth-pennsylvania-liquor-control-board-pacommwct-1983.