130 St. Marks Place LLC v. Hines

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 17, 2017
Docket2017 NYSlipOp 50214(U)
StatusPublished

This text of 130 St. Marks Place LLC v. Hines (130 St. Marks Place LLC v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
130 St. Marks Place LLC v. Hines, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion



130 St. Marks Place LLC, Petitioner-Appellant,

against

Rafael Hines, Respondent-Respondent.


Petitioner appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jean T. Schneider, J.), dated February 19, 2016, which granted respondent's motion for attorney's fees as a prevailing party in a holdover summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Jean T. Schneider, J.), dated February 19, 2016, affirmed, with $10 costs.

We sustain the grant of respondent's motion for attorneys' fees, albeit for reasons slightly different from those stated by Civil Court. In the particular circumstances at issue, where nearly one year has passed since the discontinuance of the holdover proceeding and no new proceeding was commenced by petitioner to determine the merits of its possessory claim, the only reasonable conclusion is that petitioner abandoned the matter and no longer contemplates suit on the underlying merits of that claim (see Park South Associates v Essebag, 126 Misc 2d 994 [1984]; N.V. Madison v Saurwein, 103 Misc 2d 996 [1980]). In this context, respondent is entitled to his reasonable attorneys' fees, since petitioner should not be permitted to postpone indefinitely the "ultimate outcome" of the lawsuit, effectively denying respondent attorneys' fees (see Centennial Restorations Co. v Wyatt, 248 AD2d 193, 197 [1998]).

We have considered and rejected petitioner's remaining arguments.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: February 17, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Centennial Restorations Co. v. Wyatt
248 A.D.2d 193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
N. V. Madison, Inc. v. Saurwein
103 Misc. 2d 996 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Park South Associates v. Essebag
126 Misc. 2d 994 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 St. Marks Place LLC v. Hines, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/130-st-marks-place-llc-v-hines-nyappterm-2017.