12-28 964

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedNovember 30, 2017
Docket12-28 964
StatusUnpublished

This text of 12-28 964 (12-28 964) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
12-28 964, (bva 2017).

Opinion

Citation Nr: 1755105 Decision Date: 11/30/17 Archive Date: 12/07/17

DOCKET NO. 12-28 964 ) DATE ) )

On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Houston, Texas

THE ISSUES

1. Entitlement to a higher initial evaluation for service-connected hallux valgus of the left foot, rated as 0 percent disabling prior to February 16, 2016, and as 10 percent disabling on and after July 1, 2016.

2. Entitlement to an initial compensable evaluation for service-connected hallux valgus of the right foot prior to October 11, 2016, and as 10 percent disabling on and after February 1, 2017.

REPRESENTATION

Appellant represented by: Texas Veterans Commission

WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL

Appellant

ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

Elizabeth Jalley, Counsel

INTRODUCTION

The Veteran served on active duty from January 2002 to August 2006.

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a January 2008 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Houston, Texas.

The January 2008 rating decision granted service connection for hallux valgus of the left and right feet and assigned noncompensable (0 percent) ratings for each of them, effective August 13, 2006.

A notice of disagreement with the disability ratings was received in January 2009, a statement of the case was issued in October 2009, and a substantive appeal was received in October 2009.

In a July 2016 rating decision, the VA RO in Salt Lake City, Utah, assigned a temporary total (100 percent) rating for surgical treatment of the left foot hallux valgus that required convalescence, effective from February 16, 2016. In an August 2016 rating decision, the Appeals Management Center (AMC) in Washington, DC, assigned a 10 percent rating for hallux valgus effective July 1, 2016. The Veteran was therefore in receipt of a temporary 100 percent rating for his left foot hallux valgus from February 16, 2016, through June 30, 2016. Because the 100 percent rating for that portion of the appeal constitutes a full grant of that portion of the benefit sought, that period is no longer on appeal.

In February 2013, the Veteran testified at a personal hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge. A transcript of this hearing was prepared and associated with the claims file.

In December 2014, September 2015, May 2016, and June 2017 the Board remanded this case for additional development.

On the most recent remand, the Veteran's right foot disability was recharacterized as "right hallux valgus, right foot status post bunionectomy." A July 2017 rating decision granted a temporary total rating based on surgical or other treatment necessitating convalescence effective October 11, 2016. It assigned a 10 percent evaluation under Diagnostic Code 5280, effective February 1, 2017, because "a bunionectomy by definition is a resection of the metatarsal head."

Because the 100 percent rating assignment constitutes a full grant of that portion of the benefit sought, the period from October 11, 2016, through January 31, 2017, is no longer on appeal.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Prior to February 16, 2016, the Veteran's hallux valgus of the left foot manifested in painful motion.

2. Prior to October 11, 2016, the Veteran's hallux valgus of the right foot manifested in painful motion.

3. On and after July 1, 2016, the Veteran is in receipt of the maximum schedular rating available for left foot hallux valgus. His left foot hallux valgus does not include manifestations of malunion or nonunion of the tarsal or metatarsal bones, produce symptoms which approximate amputation of the great toes with removal of the metatarsal head, nor is there clinical evidence of flatfoot, bilateral weak foot, claw foot, or a foot injury associated with the service connected disability.

4. On and after February 1, 2017, the Veteran is in receipt of the maximum schedular rating available for right foot hallux valgus. His right foot hallux valgus does not include manifestations of malunion or nonunion of the tarsal or metatarsal bones, produce symptoms which approximate amputation of the great toes with removal of the metatarsal head, nor is there clinical evidence of flatfoot, bilateral weak foot, claw foot, or a foot injury associated with the service connected disability.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. Prior to February 16, 2016, the criteria for a rating of 10 percent, but no higher, for left foot hallux valgus have been met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5280 (2017).

2. Prior to October 11, 2016, the criteria for a rating of 10 percent, but no higher, for right foot hallux valgus have been met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5280 (2017).

3. On and after July 1, 2016, the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent for left foot hallux valgus have not been met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5280 (2017).

4. On and after February 1, 2017, the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent for right foot hallux valgus have not been met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5280 (2017).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

VA's duty to notify was satisfied by a letter that was sent to the Veteran in November 2006. See 38 U.S.C. §§ 5102, 5103, 5103A (West 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159 (2017); see also Scott v. McDonald, 789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

All relevant, obtainable evidence has been associated with the claims file to fulfill VA's duty to assist. 38 U.S.C. § 5103A.

Disability ratings are determined by the application of the VA's Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Separate diagnostic codes identify the various disabilities. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § Part 4 (2017). Ratings for service-connected disabilities are determined by comparing the Veteran's symptoms with criteria listed in VA's Schedule for Rating Disabilities, which is based, as far as practically can be determined, on average impairment in earning capacity.

When there is a question as to which of two ratings to apply, the higher rating will be assigned if the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating, otherwise the lower rating shall be assigned. 38 C.F.R. § 4.7 (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyra K. Mitchell v. Eric K. Shinseki
25 Vet. App. 32 (Veterans Claims, 2011)
Russell W. Burton v. Eric K. Shinseki
25 Vet. App. 1 (Veterans Claims, 2011)
Scott v. McDonald
789 F.3d 1375 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Ulysses Copeland v. Robert A. McDonald
27 Vet. App. 333 (Veterans Claims, 2015)
Gilbert v. Derwinski
1 Vet. App. 49 (Veterans Claims, 1990)
Suttmann v. Brown
5 Vet. App. 127 (Veterans Claims, 1993)
DeLuca v. Brown
8 Vet. App. 202 (Veterans Claims, 1995)
Fenderson v. West
12 Vet. App. 119 (Veterans Claims, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12-28 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/12-28-964-bva-2017.