117 & 127 West 48th Street Corp. v. Gould

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

117 & 127 West 48th Street Corp. v. Gould

9 Misc. 2d 414, 164 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3215

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Misc. 2d 414 (117 & 127 West 48th Street Corp. v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

117 & 127 West 48th Street Corp. v. Gould, 9 Misc. 2d 414, 164 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The landlord’s certificate of occupancy provides that the space occupied by the tenant may be used for office purposes. The tenant conducts a library service on the demised premises. This includes storing a large quantity of books. In 1950 the Department of Housing and Buildings served a violation on the landlord because the portion of the building occupied by the tenant was not being used in accord with the certificate. The violation remained dormant for five years. But in 1955 the department gave notice that upon failure to comply, prosecution would follow. The landlord gave notice to the tenant, consonant with the lease, that the latter comply or vacate the premises. Upon refusal this action for eviction was brought.

In such an action the main issue is whose duty it is to effect compliance, and embraces such subordinate issues as what must be done to effect compliance. These issues were never tried. Instead the court assumed that the objection of the department stemmed from the fact that the floors were overloaded by the weight of the books stored. He sought to correct this condition by having the tenant voluntarily remove a large number of books and when the load was reduced to a figure that the court deemed safe, dismissing the petition. However direct and laudable this approach may be, it is the function of the department and not of the court, and however tempting it may have been to dispose of the matter by action that the department should have long since taken, it cannot be upheld.

[416]*416The indicated issues should be tried and the case disposed of as they are resolved.

The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The landlord’s certificate of occupancy provides that the space occupied by the tenant may be used for office purposes. The tenant conducts a library service on the demised premises. This includes storing a large quantity of books. In 1950 the Department of Housing and Buildings served a violation on the landlord because the portion of the building occupied by the tenant was not being used in accord with the certificate. The violation remained dormant for five years. But in 1955 the department gave notice that upon failure to comply, prosecution would follow. The landlord gave notice to the tenant, consonant with the lease, that the latter comply or vacate the premises. Upon refusal this action for eviction was brought.

In such an action the main issue is whose duty it is to effect compliance, and embraces such subordinate issues as what must be done to effect compliance. These issues were never tried. Instead the court assumed that the objection of the department stemmed from the fact that the floors were overloaded by the weight of the books stored. He sought to correct this condition by having the tenant voluntarily remove a large number of books and when the load was reduced to a figure that the court deemed safe, dismissing the petition. However direct and laudable this approach may be, it is the function of the department and not of the court, and however tempting it may have been to dispose of the matter by action that the department should have long since taken, it cannot be upheld.

[416]*416The indicated issues should be tried and the case disposed of as they are resolved.

The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Misc. 2d 414, 164 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/117-127-west-48th-street-corp-v-gould-nyappterm-1957.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack