115 West 27th Street Co. v. Fansy Products, Inc.

202 A.D.2d 210, 609 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered on June 16, 1993, which directed that plaintiff recover the sum of $14,656.19 from defendant Peter Savitt and have execution thereon, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly found that defendant had not established sufficient cause such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident to invalidate a stipulation, unambiguous on its face, that was freely negotiated and entered into by all of the parties, including defendant Savitt (see, Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224). Defendant Savitt’s belated claim that he never contemplated that he would be personally liable for the debts of the corporate defendants, of which he was an officer, is without merit in light of the unequivocal terms and reach of the stipulation. The court may not fashion a new agreement under the guise of construction (see, Slatt v Slatt, 64 NY2d 966). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

115 West 27th Street Co. v. Fansy Products, Inc., 202 A.D.2d 210, 609 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 210 (115 West 27th Street Co. v. Fansy Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallock v. State
474 N.E.2d 1178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Slatt v. Slatt
477 N.E.2d 1099 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)