112 Grocery v. Cappel
230 So. 2d 94, 255 La. 246, 1970 La. LEXIS 3763
Opinion
In re: 112 Grocery et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 228 So.2d 157.
Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction for review. Relator failed to attach the application for permit to sell “3.2 beer” to his petition and failed to allege the year or time for which he requests that permit. Relator • seeks only a writ ■ of mandamus which will not issue under allegations lacking such specificity.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
112 Grocery v. Cappel, 230 So. 2d 94, 255 La. 246, 1970 La. LEXIS 3763 (La. 1970).
230 So. 2d 94 (112 Grocery v. Cappel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Helverson v. Rapides Parish Police Jury
391 So. 2d 516 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
Nomey v. State
315 So. 2d 709 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)
State v. Sissons
292 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1974)
State v. Beene
269 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)