112 Grocery v. Cappel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

112 Grocery v. Cappel

230 So. 2d 94, 255 La. 246, 1970 La. LEXIS 3763

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 20, 1970

DocketNo. 50304

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 230 So. 2d 94 (112 Grocery v. Cappel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

112 Grocery v. Cappel, 230 So. 2d 94, 255 La. 246, 1970 La. LEXIS 3763 (La. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: 112 Grocery et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 228 So.2d 157.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction for review. Relator failed to attach the application for permit to sell “3.2 beer” to his petition and failed to allege the year or time for which he requests that permit. Relator • seeks only a writ ■ of mandamus which will not issue under allegations lacking such specificity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: 112 Grocery et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 228 So.2d 157.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction for review. Relator failed to attach the application for permit to sell “3.2 beer” to his petition and failed to allege the year or time for which he requests that permit. Relator • seeks only a writ ■ of mandamus which will not issue under allegations lacking such specificity.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 So. 2d 94, 255 La. 246, 1970 La. LEXIS 3763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/112-grocery-v-cappel-la-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack