110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera
This text of 32 Misc. 2d 663 (110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The failure of the landlord to allege and prove compliance with subdivision 1 of section 52 and section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations requiring landlord to plead and prove that landlord sent notice to the tenant with demand that violations be removed within 10-day limitation period was fatal to the right of landlord to maintain instant proceeding (Joyce Prop. v. Wilkenson, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 179).
The final order should he reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Final order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 2d 663, 227 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/110th-street-holding-corp-v-herrera-nyappterm-1961.