110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera

32 Misc. 2d 663, 227 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3415
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 2d 663 (110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera, 32 Misc. 2d 663, 227 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The failure of the landlord to allege and prove compliance with subdivision 1 of section 52 and section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations requiring landlord to plead and prove that landlord sent notice to the tenant with demand that violations be removed within 10-day limitation period was fatal to the right of landlord to maintain instant proceeding (Joyce Prop. v. Wilkenson, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 179).

The final order should he reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 2d 663, 227 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/110th-street-holding-corp-v-herrera-nyappterm-1961.