1040 Springfield Avenue Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

185 F.2d 406
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 13, 1950·No. 10199·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the Tax Court the taxpayer seeks to override that court’s conclusion that the failure to file a personal holding company return for the period in question was due to wilful neglect. Our decisions in Girard Investment Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1941, 122 F.2d 843 and Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 628, are relied on. But unlike the situations in those cases, there is an express finding that the petitioner did not advise its tax consultant of all the facts pertaining to the question of whether or not it was a personal holding company. This finding has adequate support in the evidence. The cases above cited are not applicable.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1040 Springfield Avenue Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 185 F.2d 406 (3d Cir. 1950).

185 F.2d 406 (1040 Springfield Avenue Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
162 F.2d 628 (Third Circuit, 1947)
Girard Inv. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
122 F.2d 843 (Third Circuit, 1941)