103 Rest. Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

103 Rest. Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

32 A.D.2d 542, 299 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4244

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 542 (103 Rest. Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

103 Rest. Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 32 A.D.2d 542, 299 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the State Liquor Authority, dated October 31, 1968, which revoked petitioner’s restaurant liquor license and made demand upon petitioner’s surety bond of $1,000, on the ground that petitioner had permitted trafficking in narcotics on the licensed premises. Determination modified, on the law, by annulling the revocation and the bond demand and substituting therefor a provision that the license be suspended for 30 days. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the punishment imposed was excessive and should be reduced to a suspension of 30 days. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the State Liquor Authority, dated October 31, 1968, which revoked petitioner’s restaurant liquor license and made demand upon petitioner’s surety bond of $1,000, on the ground that petitioner had permitted trafficking in narcotics on the licensed premises. Determination modified, on the law, by annulling the revocation and the bond demand and substituting therefor a provision that the license be suspended for 30 days. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the punishment imposed was excessive and should be reduced to a suspension of 30 days. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 542, 299 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/103-rest-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1969.