101 W. 70th Street Associates v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal

269 A.D.2d 316, 704 N.Y.S.2d 463, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2057
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about September 24, 1998, which, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding by petitioner landlord to restrain respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) from entertaining respondent tenants’ fair market rent appeal, granted DHCR’s cross motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no merit to petitioner’s argument that DHCR lacks jurisdiction to establish the fair market rent of an apartment rented for more than $2,000 upon decontrol. Were such the case, a landlord could exempt itself from initial rent regulation of a decontrolled apartment simply by pegging the rent at a level above $2,000. That such was not intended is clearly indicated by the general applicability of fair market rent procedures to initially decontrolled apartments without specific exception for high rent apartments (Rent Stabilization Law [Administrative Code of City of NY] § 26-513 [b] [1], [2]). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

101 W. 70th Street Associates v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 269 A.D.2d 316, 704 N.Y.S.2d 463, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 316 (101 W. 70th Street Associates v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

430 Realty Co. v. Heftler
185 Misc. 2d 450 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2000)