101 Park Avenue Associates v. Trane Co.

New York Court of Appeals

101 Park Avenue Associates v. Trane Co.

465 N.E.2d 359, 62 N.Y.2d 734, 476 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4332

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1984·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 428). Respondent Trane, as an unpaid subcontractor, has an unqualified right to a mechanic’s lien upon the improved real property (Lien Law, § 3). Petitioners have failed to show a basis for discharge of that lien pursuant to section 19 of the Lien Law as the undertaking filed covers only the lien of the contractor Raisler Corporation.

[736]*736Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 428). Respondent Trane, as an unpaid subcontractor, has an unqualified right to a mechanic’s lien upon the improved real property (Lien Law, § 3). Petitioners have failed to show a basis for discharge of that lien pursuant to section 19 of the Lien Law as the undertaking filed covers only the lien of the contractor Raisler Corporation.

[736]*736Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

101 Park Avenue Associates v. Trane Co., 465 N.E.2d 359, 62 N.Y.2d 734, 476 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4332 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

465 N.E.2d 359 (101 Park Avenue Associates v. Trane Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related