10 & Scotia Plaza, LLC v. All Occupants

725 N.W.2d 341, 477 Mich. 981

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in 10 & Scotia Plaza, LLC v. All Occupants. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 1060 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 4, 2007·No. 132331·Published

Opinion

725 N.W.2d 341 (2007)

10 & SCOTIA PLAZA, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALL OCCUPANTS, Defendant-Appellee, and
Grinderz Oak Park, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132331. COA No. 269184.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 4, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

725 N.W.2d 341 (2007)

10 & SCOTIA PLAZA, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALL OCCUPANTS, Defendant-Appellee, and
Grinderz Oak Park, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132331. COA No. 269184.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 4, 2007.

10 & Scotia Plaza, LLC v. All Occupants, 725 N.W.2d 341, 477 Mich. 981 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

725 N.W.2d 341 (10 & Scotia Plaza, LLC v. All Occupants) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

10 & SCOTIA PLAZA, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALL OCCUPANTS, Defendant-Appellee, and Grinderz Oak Park, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

10 & SCOTIA PLAZA, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALL OCCUPANTS, Defendant-Appellee, and
Grinderz Oak Park, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellee.