10-48 699

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedOctober 31, 2017
Docket10-48 699
StatusUnpublished

This text of 10-48 699 (10-48 699) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10-48 699, (bva 2017).

Opinion

Citation Nr: 1749176 Decision Date: 10/31/17 Archive Date: 11/06/17

DOCKET NO. 10-48 699 ) DATE ) )

On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Detroit, Michigan

THE ISSUES

1. Entitlement to secondary service connection for hypertension.

2. Entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for iatrogenic hypothyroidism.

3. Entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for a history of laryngeal carcinoma.

REPRESENTATION

Veteran represented by: The American Legion

WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL

The Veteran

ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

S. S. Mahoney, Associate Counsel

INTRODUCTION

The Veteran served on active duty in the United States Army from November 1965 to November 1967.

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an April 2008 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Detroit, Michigan.

Notably, during the pendency of this appeal, a February 2017 rating decision awarded service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and a TDIU. These issues are accordingly not in appellate status. Locklear v. Shinseki, 24 Vet.App. 311, 315 (2011) (VA may bifurcate TDIU from an appeal of the underlying evaluation).

In August 2015, the Veteran testified at a hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge. A transcript of that proceeding is of record.

In October 2015, the Board remanded the issues on appeal for further development. The Veteran's claims file has been returned to the Board for further appellate proceedings.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Veteran's hypertension is proximately due to his service-connected obstructive sleep apnea.

2. From July 30, 2007 to July 16, 2009, the Veteran's iatrogenic hypothyroidism was manifested by fatigability, constipation and mental sluggishness. 3. From July 17, 2009 to December 28, 2011, the Veteran's iatrogenic hypothyroidism was manifested by weight gain and mental disturbance.

4. From December 29, 2011, the Veteran's iatrogenic hypothyroidism was manifested by cold intolerance, mental disturbance and sleepiness.

5. From July 30, 2006 to October 31, 2008, the Veteran's history of laryngeal carcinoma was manifested by hoarseness.

6. From November 1, 2008, the Veteran's history of laryngeal carcinoma was manifested by hoarseness with thickening of cords and pre-malignant changes on biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The criteria for entitlement to secondary service connection for hypertension are met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.310 (2016).

2. From July 30, 2007 to July 16, 2009, the criteria for an initial 30 percent rating for iatrogenic hypothyroidism are met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.119, Diagnostic Code (DC) 7903 (2016).

3. From July 17, 2009 to December 28, 2011, the criteria for a 60 percent rating for iatrogenic hypothyroidism are met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.119, Diagnostic Code (DC) 7903 (2016).

4. From December 29, 2011, the criteria for a 100 percent rating for iatrogenic hypothyroidism are met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.119, Diagnostic Code (DC) 7903 (2016).

5. From July 30, 2006 to October 31, 2008, the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent for a history of laryngeal carcinoma are not met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.97, DCs 6599-6516 (2016). 6. From November 1, 2008, the criteria for a maximum 30 percent rating for a history of laryngeal carcinoma are met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.97, DCs 6599-6516 (2016).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Service Connection for Hypertension

The Veteran asserts that his hypertension is caused by his service-connected obstructive sleep apnea. As secondary service connection on a proximate cause basis is warranted, the Board need not explore direct service connection in this case.

Service connection may be established on a secondary basis for a disability proximately due to or aggravated by a service-connected disease or injury. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a); see also Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995) (en banc). To establish secondary service connection, a Veteran must show: (1) the existence of a present disability; (2) the existence of a service-connected disability; and (3) a causal relationship between the present disability and the service-connected disability. See Wallin v. West, 11 Vet. App. 509, 512 (1998).

Here, the Veteran is currently diagnosed with hypertension. See September 2014 VA treatment record and March 2017 VA examination report. He is currently service-connected for obstructive sleep apnea. Therefore, the first and second elements of secondary service connection are established.

Regarding the final element, nexus, the only competent opinion of record is in favor of the claim. Specifically, the March 2017 VA examiner opined that it was at least as likely as not that the Veteran's hypertension was proximately due to his service-connected sleep apnea. The examiner explained that "sleep apnea is a recognized cause of secondary hypertension" and that it produces "surges in systolic and diastolic pressure that keep mean blood pressure levels elevated at night." She further stated that in many patients, "blood pressure remains elevated during the daytime, when breathing is normal." This opinion is highly probative, as it was based on a thorough review of the Veteran's relevant medical history, and contains a detailed rationale. Accordingly, as all the elements for secondary service connection have been met, the benefit sought on appeal is granted.

Increased Ratings - Rules and Regulations

Disability ratings are determined by applying the criteria set forth in the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, found in 38 C.F.R., Part 4. The percentage ratings represent, as far as can practicably be determined, the average impairment in earning capacity in civil occupations. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155. The disability must be viewed in relation to its history. 38 C.F.R. § 4.1. If two disability ratings are potentially applicable, the higher evaluation will be assigned if the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria for that rating; otherwise, the lower rating will be assigned. 38 C.F.R. § 4.7. Reasonable doubt as to the degree of disability will be resolved in favor of the claimant. 38 C.F.R. § 4.3.

Iatrogenic Hypothyroidism

The Veteran's hypothyroidism has been rated at 10 percent disabling since July 30, 2007 under the provisions of 38 C.F.R.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaston v. SHINSEKI
605 F.3d 979 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Dianne C. Tatum v. Eric K. Shinseki
23 Vet. App. 152 (Veterans Claims, 2009)
Edison B. Locklear v. Eric K. Shinseki
24 Vet. App. 311 (Veterans Claims, 2011)
Ulysses Copeland v. Robert A. McDonald
27 Vet. App. 333 (Veterans Claims, 2015)
Allen v. Brown
7 Vet. App. 439 (Veterans Claims, 1995)
Wallin v. West
11 Vet. App. 509 (Veterans Claims, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10-48 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/10-48-699-bva-2017.