1-900-Autofax, Inc. v. Niagara Frontier Automobile Dealers Ass'n
This text of 209 A.D.2d 1016 (1-900-Autofax, Inc. v. Niagara Frontier Automobile Dealers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Flaherty, J.). We add only that defendants did not rely upon the defense of qualified privilege in their motion for summary judgment and, therefore, their argument on appeal concerning that defense is not preserved for review (see, Oram v Capone, 206 AD2d 839). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Defamation.) Present—Green, J. P., Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 1016, 619 N.Y.S.2d 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1-900-autofax-inc-v-niagara-frontier-automobile-dealers-assn-nyappdiv-1994.